BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs Color Icon Lip Gloss: which is safer?

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

Becca Cosmetics

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 71/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Wet N Wild Color Icon Lip Gloss

Wet n Wild

Color Icon Lip Gloss

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

liquid gloss base (oils, resins, silicones)

Confidence

45%

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (preservative system)

PossibleMicroplastics (synthetic polymers in formula)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Wet n Wild.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens, Formaldehyde releasers (preservative system) and Microplastics (synthetic polymers in formula) on the Wet n Wild and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
  • The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the Wet n Wild is liquid gloss base (oils, resins, silicones), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Wet n Wild grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick, see the full ranking