Sol Groove Retro Surf One vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Billabong Sol Groove Retro Surf One carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Billabong Sol Groove Retro Surf One

Billabong

Sol Groove Retro Surf One

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 39/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Polyester swim/surf fabric

Confidence

65%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metals in synthetic dyes

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishes

PossibleAntimony trioxide in polyester fiber

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metals in synthetic dyes, Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishes, Antimony trioxide in polyester fiber and Elastic degradation and microfiber shedding on the Billabong and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Billabong.
  • The Billabong is Polyester swim/surf fabric where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear: see the full ranking