Cushion Support Shoe Insole Replacement 11.5-12 vs Pulse Performance Insoles: which is safer?

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Brooks Cushion Support Shoe Insole Replacement 11.5-12

Brooks

Cushion Support Shoe Insole Replacement 11.5-12

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 47/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

foam insole, likely EVA or polyurethane foam

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in foam adhesives

ReportedMicroplastics and foam degradation shedding

PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Our pick

PowerStep Pulse Performance Insoles

Powerstep

Pulse Performance Insoles

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

EVA foam, gel, fabric blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes in fabric blend

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in foam adhesives, Microplastics and foam degradation shedding and Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing on the Brooks and not on the Powerstep.
  • We flag Azo dyes in fabric blend and Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing on the Powerstep and not on the Brooks.
  • The Brooks is foam insole, likely EVA or polyurethane foam where the Powerstep is EVA foam, gel, fabric blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking