PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall47/ 100Poor
Brooks Cushion Support Shoe Insole Replacement 11.5-12

Brooks · Synthetic Athletic Insoles & Orthotics

Brooks Cushion Support Shoe Insole Replacement 11.5-12

Good

Standard foam insoles rarely use PFAS compounds.

Verdict · SkipReplacement foam insoles with no established safety issues; standard EVA/polyurethane construction carries minimal hazard when used as intended.

Foam or gel replacement insoles without water-resistant coatings reported. Brooks offers no public PFAS disclosure but material type carries minimal risk.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

foam insole, likely EVA or polyurethane foam

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Closed-cell foam insoles may incorporate small amounts of formaldehyde-based binders or glues in lamination layers, though levels in replacement insoles are typically far lower than in finished shoe construction. Off-gassing at body temperature (37°C in shoe environment) is expected to be minimal but not zero.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Polyurethane and EVA foam insoles shed microscopic particles with normal wear and compression; this is documented across the insole category. Quantities are small and confined to shoe environment, with negligible inhalation or ingestion risk in typical use, though long-term environmental impact from discarded insoles is a sustainability concern.

Source, EPA
45/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

New foam insoles may emit low levels of VOCs during initial use as residual solvents from manufacturing evaporate; ventilation and air exposure for 24-48 hours before wearing can reduce this. This is typical for foam products and dissipates quickly in well-ventilated footwear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100

Azo dyes and colorant stability

Gray and white pigmentation in Brooks insoles are standard formulations; no recalls or known migration of colorants into skin have been documented. Azo dyes in foam substrates present minimal skin contact risk unless insole is worn directly against broken skin.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Brooks replacement insoles are not known to contain cadmium, lead, or antimony in colorants based on available public records. Standard inorganic pigments used in foam insoles do not pose heavy metal leaching risk under normal foot-wear conditions.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Brooks Cushion Support replacement insoles are foam-based, most likely EVA (ethylene-vinyl acetate) or polyurethane closed-cell foam, both widely used in footwear without major safety concerns when formulated properly. These materials provide cushioning and do not off-gas significantly at room temperature in foot-worn conditions. The gray/white colorant is typically inorganic or azo-based pigment, standard in athletic footwear; no known contamination issues are documented for Brooks branded insoles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Brooks (owned by Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary Wolverine World Wide) maintains modest sustainability commitments but does not publish detailed chemical composition or third-party safety certifications for individual insole products. The brand has not faced recalled insoles or documented chemical safety failures in replacement footbed products. Disclosure on manufacturing standards for foam composition is limited, reflecting typical industry opacity rather than a specific red flag.

How it compares in its category

Replacement insoles occupy a low-risk category within apparel/footwear; they avoid many hazards associated with finished shoes (adhesives, leather treatments, dye fixatives). Brooks replacements are comparable to Superfeet, Powerstep, and Scholl branded alternatives. None of these products routinely disclose full chemical compliance beyond basic material type, making direct comparison difficult but also indicating absence of category-specific scandals.

If you buy it

Store in a dry environment; do not expose to prolonged heat (above 60°C) as foam may degrade. Replace when compression becomes noticeable (typically 6-12 months of regular use) to maintain cushioning efficacy. Hand wash if soiled; air dry fully. No special handling is required beyond typical footwear care. Not intended for use in extreme heat or with chemical treatment.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Brooks has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More synthetic athletic insoles & orthotics grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.