Ceramic Nonstick Frying Pan 12" vs Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan: which is safer?

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan is the clear pick. Calphalon Ceramic Nonstick Frying Pan 12" carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Calphalon Ceramic Nonstick Frying Pan 12"

Calphalon

Ceramic Nonstick Frying Pan 12"

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

72%

LikelyCeramic coating degradation and flaking

PossibleAluminum leaching (substrate exposure)

PossibleNonstick coating fume risk (unknown thermal stability)

Our pick

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

GreenPan

Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 58/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

82%

PossibleCoating degradation and particulate release

PossibleAluminum leaching from base metal

PossibleThermal polymer decomposition fumes

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Ceramic coating degradation and flaking, Aluminum leaching (substrate exposure) and Nonstick coating fume risk (unknown thermal stability) on the Calphalon and not on the GreenPan.
  • We flag Coating degradation and particulate release, Aluminum leaching from base metal and Thermal polymer decomposition fumes on the GreenPan and not on the Calphalon.
  • The gap is 55 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More nonstick skillets, see the full ranking