Nonstick Ceramic Cookware Set vs Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan: which is safer?
Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Caraway
Nonstick Ceramic Cookware Set
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAluminum leaching (from core if coating fails)
ReportedCeramic coating degradation and loss of nonstick performance
PossibleMicrochipping or flaking of ceramic into food
Our pick
GreenPan
Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAluminum leaching
PossibleCeramic coating degradation and flaking
PossibleHeat stability of coating under normal use
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Aluminum leaching (from core if coating fails), Ceramic coating degradation and loss of nonstick performance and Microchipping or flaking of ceramic into food on the Caraway and not on the GreenPan.
- We flag Aluminum leaching, Ceramic coating degradation and flaking and Heat stability of coating under normal use on the GreenPan and not on the Caraway.
- The Caraway is ceramic nonstick coating (proprietary, PFAS-free) where the GreenPan is Ceramic nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ceramic cookware, see the full ranking