Nonstick Ceramic Medium Baking Sheet vs Double Burner Griddle: which is safer?

Caraway Nonstick Ceramic Medium Baking Sheet is the clear pick. Imusa Double Burner Griddle carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Caraway Nonstick Ceramic Medium Baking Sheet

Caraway

Nonstick Ceramic Medium Baking Sheet

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

92%

PossibleCeramic coating degradation over time

Imusa Double Burner Griddle

Imusa

Double Burner Griddle

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 3/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Carbon steel with unspecified nonstick coating

Confidence

45%

PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based nonstick)

PossibleCoating degradation and shedding

PossibleIron leaching from bare steel if coating fails

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Ceramic coating degradation over time on the Caraway and not on the Imusa.
  • We flag PTFE fume risk (if PTFE-based nonstick), Coating degradation and shedding and Iron leaching from bare steel if coating fails on the Imusa and not on the Caraway.
  • The Caraway is ceramic nonstick coating where the Imusa is Carbon steel with unspecified nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Caraway is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Imusa grade, at 45% confidence against 92%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More bakeware, see the full ranking