RSCU Ripstop Coverall vs Forge Men's 3-Pocket V-Neck Scrub Top: which is safer?

Dickies Forge Men's 3-Pocket V-Neck Scrub Top is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Carhartt RSCU Ripstop Coverall

Carhartt

RSCU Ripstop Coverall

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Cotton-polyester ripstop blend with water-repellent coating

Confidence

45%

LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating (fluorinated treatment)

PossibleAntimony in polyester component

Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and skin exposure over time

Our pick

Dickies Forge Men's 3-Pocket V-Neck Scrub Top

Dickies

Forge Men's 3-Pocket V-Neck Scrub Top

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

100% cotton twill

Confidence

82%

PossibleAzo dyes and restricted colorants

PossibleAllergens in dyes and finishes

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in DWR coating (fluorinated treatment), Antimony in polyester component and DWR coating degradation and skin exposure over time on the Carhartt and not on the Dickies.
  • We flag Azo dyes and restricted colorants and Allergens in dyes and finishes on the Dickies and not on the Carhartt.
  • The Carhartt is Cotton-polyester ripstop blend with durable water-repellent coating where the Dickies is 100% cotton twill, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Dickies is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Carhartt grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More scrubs & work uniforms, see the full ranking