Hyaluronic Happikiss vs ShineOn Lip Jelly: which is safer?
ShineOn Lip Jelly is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Charlotte Tilbury
Hyaluronic Happikiss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Lip tint pigments, humectants, waxes, oils in cosmetic formulation
Confidence
78%
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination
PossibleHeavy metals in synthetic iron oxide or carmine pigments
ReportedContact sensitization from waxes or fragrance compounds
Our pick
Tower 28
ShineOn Lip Jelly
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Jelly base, pigments, oils
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and irritants
Possible1,4-dioxane in cosmetic ingredients
Where these two actually differ
- We flag 1,4-dioxane contamination, Heavy metals in synthetic iron oxide or carmine pigments and Contact sensitization from waxes or fragrance compounds on the Charlotte Tilbury and not on the Tower 28.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and irritants and 1,4-dioxane in cosmetic ingredients on the Tower 28 and not on the Charlotte Tilbury.
- The Charlotte Tilbury is Lip tint pigments, humectants, waxes, oils in cosmetic formulation where the Tower 28 is Jelly base, pigments, oils, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip gloss, see the full ranking