Three Compartment Lunch Thermos With Spork (missing Bowl And vs Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid: which is safer?
Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Coleman
Three Compartment Lunch Thermos With Spork (missing Bowl And
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePlastic lid and spork degradation over time
PossibleBacterial growth in unsealed compartments
PossibleOdor or off-gassing from plastic components when heated
Our pick
Klean Kanteen
Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleSilicone gasket degradation
PossibleBacterial growth in vacuum seal
PossibleSurface corrosion under acidic conditions
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Plastic lid and spork degradation over time, Bacterial growth in unsealed compartments and Odor or off-gassing from plastic components when heated on the Coleman and not on the Klean Kanteen.
- We flag Silicone gasket degradation, Bacterial growth in vacuum seal and Surface corrosion under acidic conditions on the Klean Kanteen and not on the Coleman.
- The Coleman is stainless steel thermos, plastic lid and spork where the Klean Kanteen is Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Klean Kanteen is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lunch boxes: see the full ranking