PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall58/ 100Good
Coleman Three Compartment Lunch Thermos With Spork (missing Bowl And

Coleman · Lunch Boxes

Coleman Three Compartment Lunch Thermos With Spork (missing Bowl And

Good

Lower concern. Typical thermos design poses minimal PFAS risk.

Verdict · BuyStainless steel thermos with plastic components poses minimal chemical risk if used as intended; low brand disclosure but no established safety issues.

Coleman thermoses use stainless steel and standard plastics without known Teflon-family coating coatings. No PFAS claims made, but the design suggests routine food contact materials with lower inherent PFAS risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

stainless steel thermos, plastic lid and spork

Lab data

No public lab test

What Coleman Three Compartment Lunch Thermos is made of, ingredients and materials

The thermos body is stainless steel, which does not leach metals or chemicals into food under normal use. The lid and spork are plastic, likely polypropylene or similar food-contact polymers. Stainless steel is not a material linked to PFAS concerns because it is chemically inert and does not degrade when in contact with food or beverages across typical temperature ranges.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Plastic lid and spork degradation over time

Repeated washing, hot liquids, and UV exposure can cause polypropylene or similar plastic components to degrade, becoming brittle or releasing trace compounds. No specific recalls exist for Coleman lunch thermos lids, but degradation is a normal lifecycle event for food-contact plastics.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth in unsealed compartments

The thermos design includes multiple compartments; if not dried thoroughly after washing, moisture can accumulate in seals and crevices, creating conditions for mold or bacterial colonization. This is a maintenance issue rather than a chemical hazard.

70/ 100
💨

Odor or off-gassing from plastic components when heated

Plastic lids exposed to very hot beverages may release minor volatile organic compounds, typically perceived as a chemical smell. This risk is minimal if liquids are cooled slightly before sealing and the lid is not heated directly.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No public evidence that Coleman uses BPA or BPS in this product line, but material composition is not explicitly disclosed. Modern polypropylene food-contact items typically do not contain these compounds, but lack of transparency means it cannot be ruled out entirely.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Stainless steel corrosion or leaching

Food-grade stainless steel (typically 18/8 or 18/10 alloy) does not leach nickel or chromium into food under normal use. Coleman's use of stainless steel bodies is a deliberate choice to avoid this hazard class.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Coleman manufactures outdoor and camping gear with a long market history but maintains limited public transparency on chemical composition or third-party safety testing. No major recalls or chemical safety scandals are on record for this product line. The brand does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or certifications specific to food-contact components.

How it compares in its category

This product is typical for mid-range lunch thermoses; stainless steel bodies are standard across most brands in this price tier and pose minimal chemical risk compared to glass-lined or aluminum-lined alternatives. Plastic lids are common across the category; higher-end models sometimes use stainless steel or silicone lids, but functional risk from polypropylene lids is minimal if not heated excessively.

If you buy it

Hand wash the plastic components rather than running them through the dishwasher, as repeated high-heat cycles can degrade polymers over time. Do not fill with liquids hotter than 165 degrees Fahrenheit, as extended exposure to extreme heat may cause minor plastic off-gassing. Replace the lid or spork if you notice cracks, cloudiness, or odor; these are signs of degradation. Rinse thoroughly after each use and allow to air dry completely to prevent bacterial growth.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Coleman has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Lunch Boxes

Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

Klean Kanteen

Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Silicone gasket degradation

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Snapware Meal Box Glass

Snapware

Meal Box Glass

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • borosilicate glass
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Leaching from glass matrix or lid seals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Oxo Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

OXO

Steel Pop Big Square Short - 2.8 Qt/2.6 l

80ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel container, no surface treatment
  • Lid/gasket polymer leaching

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More lunch boxes grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.