Men's Arctic Peak Gloves vs R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts: which is safer?
Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts is the clear pick. Columbia Men's Arctic Peak Gloves carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Columbia
Men's Arctic Peak Gloves
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFluorocarbon water-repellent coating (PFAS-related, non-PFAS analysis)
PossibleSkin irritation or sensitization from coating or fiber
Our pick
Patagonia
R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating degradation and water-repellency loss
PossibleAllergen potential from Yulex itself
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fluorocarbon DWR coating (PFAS-related, non-PFAS analysis) and Skin irritation or sensitization from coating or fiber on the Columbia and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Coating degradation and water-repellency loss and Allergen potential from Yulex itself on the Patagonia and not on the Columbia.
- The Columbia is Synthetic insulation, nylon shell with DWR treatment where the Patagonia is Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Columbia grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof winter gloves: see the full ranking