Waterproof Winter Gloves, ranked by PFAS safety
15 products graded from Bad to Excellent, safest first. 1 grade Good or better and are worth buying.
Start here
The best non-toxic waterproof winter gloves, ranked safest first
Bad · Better · Best waterproof winter gloves
The quickest read, what to skip and the top-graded picks worth buying instead.
Columbia
Columbia Men's Powder Lite II Gloves
Moderate concern; likely water-repellent treatment but Columbia discloses no PFAS policy.
Patagonia
Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts
Lower PFAS concern; Yulex is a known PFAS-reduction choice, independent verification absent.
Worth buying Good or Excellent, safest first
Patagonia
R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts
Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
Coating degradation and water-repellency loss
Limited concern
Allergen potential from Yulex itself
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern; Yulex is a known PFAS-reduction choice, independent verification absent.
⚠Risky category by default
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Patagonia
Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's
Polyester fleece (recycled)
Lower PFAS concern; fleece gloves rarely need water-repellent coating, but Patagonia has not publicly disclosed PFAS policy.
⚠Risky category by default
The North Face
Women's Montana Ski Glove
Nylon/polyester shell with waterproofing treatment
PFAS
High concern
Microplastics
Limited concern
Wait for North Face to disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; ski gloves typically use PFAS-based waterproofing.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
The North Face
Women's Etip Indi Gloves
Nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating
PFAS
Limited concern
Microplastics
Limited concern
Moderate PFAS risk from waterproofing; The North Face has not disclosed coating chemistry.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
The North Face
Women's Osito Etip Glove
Polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish; fleece lining
PFAS
High concern
Polyester microfiber shedding
Limited concern
Coating degradation and leaching from heat exposure
Limited concern
Moderate caution; typical fleece glove with likely water-repellent coating but no brand PFAS transparency.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Patagonia
Homepool Mitt Fishing Gloves
Neoprene with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating
PFAS
High concern
Neoprene chlorine-release (manufacturing residue)
Limited concern
Coating degradation and microparticle shedding
Limited concern
Wait or request material specs; Patagonia's water-repellent coating finish likely contains PFAS, undisclosed.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Hestra
Fall Line Leather Ski Gloves
leather with water-repellent treatment
PFAS
Limited concern
Coating degradation and leaching over time
Limited concern
Azo dyes in leather coloring
Limited concern
Leather gloves carry moderate PFAS risk from water-repellent coating finishes; Hestra's treatment details remain opaque.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Hestra
CZone Mountain 3 Finger
Leather palm, synthetic/nylon back with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment
PFAS
Limited concern
Coating degradation and microfiber shedding
Limited concern
Wait for Hestra to disclose water-repellent coating chemistry or provide third-party PFAS testing.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Hestra
Army Leather Heli Ski Glove
Leather shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
PFAS
Limited concern
Grip coating or palm reinforcement toxicity
Limited concern
Leather ski gloves with water treatment carry inherent water-repellent coating-PFAS risk; Hestra's treatment chemicals undisclosed.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Columbia
Men's Arctic Peak Gloves
Synthetic insulation, nylon shell with water-repellent coating treatment
PFAS
Limited concern
Skin irritation or sensitization from coating or fiber
Limited concern
Moderate concern; standard water-repellent coating treatment typical of gloves; PFAS status unconfirmed.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Columbia
Men's Arctic Crest Gloves
Synthetic textile with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish (unspecified)
PFAS
Limited concern
Synthetic textile degradation and microfiber shedding
Limited concern
Wait for Columbia to disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; silent stance on PFAS raises concern.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Columbia
Women's Arctic Peak Gloves
Nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
Synthetic textile degradation and microparticle shedding
Limited concern
water-repellent coating leaching into skin or sweat
Limited concern
Wait for Columbia to disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; gloves are routine PFAS-treatment suspects.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Columbia
Women's Arctic Crest Gloves
Synthetic insulation + waterproof/breathable shell coating (unspecified)
PFAS
Limited concern
Coating degradation and leaching
Limited concern
Wait for Columbia to disclose water-repellent coating treatment; silent on PFAS is a red flag for gloves.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Columbia
Men's Arctic Slope Seeker Gloves
Synthetic insulation + polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
PFAS
Limited concern
water-repellent coating reapplication products
Limited concern
Wait or contact Columbia directly; waterproof gloves typically use PFAS-based water-repellent coating, brand discloses nothing.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Columbia
Men's Powder Lite II Gloves
Synthetic insulation (polyester/nylon shell) with water-repellent treatment
Water-repellent treatment (water-repellent coating) chemistry, likely fluorinated
High concern
Microfiber shedding from synthetic shell and insulation
Limited concern
Moderate concern; likely water-repellent treatment but Columbia discloses no PFAS policy.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Get the safe list, free
The products we score each week, and the safest alternative in every category.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.