Men's Silver Ridge Convertible Pant vs Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants: which is safer?
Columbia Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Columbia
Men's Silver Ridge Convertible Pant
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating finish
Confidence
45%
LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating finish (water-repellent coating)
PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle shedding
Our pick
Columbia
Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted)
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in DWR finish (Durable Water Repellent coating) and Coating degradation and microparticle shedding on the Columbia and not on the Columbia.
- We flag Azo dyes (synthetic colorants) on the Columbia and not on the Columbia.
- The Columbia is nylon/polyester blend with DWR finish where the Columbia is cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Columbia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Columbia grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More hiking pants, see the full ranking