Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C vs Atomo V7000-2: which is safer?

Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C

Converse

Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Canvas upper, rubber sole

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes in canvas

PossibleFormaldehyde resin finishing on canvas

Diadora Atomo V7000-2

Diadora

Atomo V7000-2

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend

Confidence

45%

PossibleAzo dyes and synthetic dyes

PossibleFormaldehyde-based finishing resins

PossibleAntimony in polyester fibers

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes in canvas and Formaldehyde resin finishing on canvas on the Converse and not on the Diadora.
  • We flag Azo dyes and synthetic dyes, Formaldehyde-based finishing resins, Antimony in polyester fibers and Adhesive and rubber off-gassing on the Diadora and not on the Converse.
  • The Converse is Canvas upper, rubber sole where the Diadora is Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Diadora grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More running & athletic shoes, see the full ranking