Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C vs Men's Altamesa 500 V2: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Converse
Chuck Taylor All Star Cx Exp2 4.5 Men A07199C
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Canvas upper, rubber sole
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes in canvas
PossibleFormaldehyde resin finishing on canvas
The North Face
Men's Altamesa 500 V2
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Mesh textile upper, foam midsole, rubber outsole
Confidence
35%
PossibleAzo dyes in synthetic textiles
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in textile bonding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes in canvas and Formaldehyde resin finishing on canvas on the Converse and not on the The North Face.
- We flag Azo dyes in synthetic textiles and Formaldehyde resins in textile bonding on the The North Face and not on the Converse.
- The Converse is Canvas upper, rubber sole where the The North Face is Mesh textile upper, foam midsole, rubber outsole, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the The North Face grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More running & athletic shoes, see the full ranking