Women's Bonded-Scuba V-Neck Swimsuit in Red vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. COS Women's Bonded-Scuba V-Neck Swimsuit in Red carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
COS
Women's Bonded-Scuba V-Neck Swimsuit in Red
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes in polyester backing
LikelyMicroplastic shedding from neoprene degradation
PossiblePolyester fiber shedding and skin irritation
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes in polyester backing, Microplastic shedding from neoprene degradation and Polyester fiber shedding and skin irritation on the COS and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the COS.
- The COS is Bonded scuba neoprene/polyester blend where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More swimwear: see the full ranking