Lounge 93" Sofa vs Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam: which is safer?

Lounge 93" Sofa is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Lounge 93" Sofa

Crate and Barrel

Lounge 93" Sofa

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 41/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Upholstered fabric, no treatment on record

Confidence

35%

LikelyFlame retardants (brominated or phosphorus-based)

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) and off-gassing

PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins in batting or adhesives

Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam

Joybird

Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 39/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

polyurethane foam

Confidence

72%

LikelyVolatile Organic Compound (VOC) Off-Gassing

PossibleFlame Retardant Chemical Content

PossibleFormaldehyde in Adhesives and Binders

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Flame retardants (brominated or phosphorus-based), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and off-gassing, Formaldehyde-releasing resins in batting or adhesives and Azo dyes and other synthetic colorants on the Crate and Barrel and not on the Joybird.
  • We flag Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Off-Gassing, Flame Retardant Chemical Content, Formaldehyde in Adhesives and Binders and Foam Degradation Over Time on the Joybird and not on the Crate and Barrel.
  • The Crate and Barrel is Upholstered fabric, no treatment on record where the Joybird is polyurethane foam, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Crate and Barrel grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More upholstered furniture, see the full ranking