Ceramica XT Nonstick 11-Piece Cookware Set vs Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan: which is safer?
Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan is the clear pick. Cuisinart Ceramica XT Nonstick 11-Piece Cookware Set carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Cuisinart
Ceramica XT Nonstick 11-Piece Cookware Set
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating degradation and aluminum leaching
PossibleTeflon-type coating or fluorinated compound residues in ceramic formulation
ReportedThermal degradation of ceramic coating at high heat
Our pick
GreenPan
Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAluminum leaching
PossibleCeramic coating degradation and flaking
PossibleHeat stability of coating under normal use
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Coating degradation and aluminum leaching, PTFE or fluorinated compound residues in ceramic formulation, Thermal degradation of ceramic coating at high heat and Microabrasion and coating particles shedding into food on the Cuisinart and not on the GreenPan.
- We flag Aluminum leaching, Ceramic coating degradation and flaking and Heat stability of coating under normal use on the GreenPan and not on the Cuisinart.
- The Cuisinart is Ceramic-based nonstick coating (composition unspecified by brand) where the GreenPan is Ceramic nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Cuisinart grade, at 40% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ceramic cookware, see the full ranking