2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078 vs Company Best Damn Fire Hose Work Apron: which is safer?
Dickies 2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078 is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Dickies
2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
analysis pending
Verdict
pending
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
100% canvas cotton, uncoated
Confidence
82%
Duluth Trading
Company Best Damn Fire Hose Work Apron
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 12/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Canvas/fire hose fabric with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
Confidence
45%
Possiblewater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) Treatment Chemistry (Fluorinated or Non-Fluorinated)
PossibleWear and Tear Release of Fibers or Coating Particles
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Durable Water-Repellent (DWR) Treatment Chemistry (Fluorinated or Non-Fluorinated) and Wear and Tear Release of Fibers or Coating Particles on the Duluth Trading and not on the Dickies.
- The Dickies is 100% canvas cotton, uncoated where the Duluth Trading is Canvas/fire hose fabric with durable water-repellent (DWR) treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Dickies is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Duluth Trading grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More work aprons: see the full ranking