2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078 vs Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron: which is safer?

Dickies 2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078 is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Dickies 2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078

Dickies

2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

analysis pending

Verdict

pending

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

100% canvas cotton, uncoated

Confidence

82%
Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron

Rip Stop by WeatherWear

Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Cotton/polyester ripstop with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Confidence

45%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in textile finishing

PossibleCoating degradation and microfiber shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in textile finishing and Coating degradation and microfiber shedding on the Rip Stop by WeatherWear and not on the Dickies.
  • The Dickies is 100% canvas cotton, uncoated where the Rip Stop by WeatherWear is Cotton/polyester ripstop with durable water repellent (DWR) finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Dickies is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Rip Stop by WeatherWear grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More work aprons: see the full ranking