WorldView Containers vs Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct: which is safer?
Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct is the clear pick. Eco-Products WorldView Containers carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Eco-Products
WorldView Containers
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in greaseproof coating
PossibleCoating migration from heat or acidic foods
PossibleMicroplastic or coating particle shedding
Our pick
Matter
Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleMicrobe/mold growth if stored damp
PossibleCellulose degradation under repeated hot/wet stress
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in greaseproof coating, Coating migration from heat or acidic foods and Microplastic or coating particle shedding on the Eco-Products and not on the Matter.
- We flag Microbe/mold growth if stored damp and Cellulose degradation under repeated hot/wet stress on the Matter and not on the Eco-Products.
- The Eco-Products is Plant-based fiber/cellulose containers with unspecified coating/sealant where the Matter is Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Matter is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Eco-Products grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More food packaging, see the full ranking