Ceratal Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan vs Stainless Clad Fry Pan: which is safer?

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. Fissler Ceratal Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Fissler Ceratal Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan

Fissler

Ceratal Classic Ceramic Non-Stick Frying Pan

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 3/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

ceramic non-stick coating

Confidence

72%

PossibleCeramic coating degradation and leaching

PossibleAluminum leaching from cookware substrate

PossibleThermal stability and coating decomposition byproducts

Our pick

Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan

Made In

Stainless Clad Fry Pan

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating

Confidence

90%

PossibleClad separation or delamination over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Ceramic coating degradation and leaching, Aluminum leaching from cookware substrate and Thermal stability and coating decomposition byproducts on the Fissler and not on the Made In.
  • We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Fissler.
  • The Fissler is ceramic non-stick coating where the Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cookware, see the full ranking