Luxe Fitness Tracker vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?

Fitbit Luxe Fitness Tracker is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Fitbit Luxe Fitness Tracker

Fitbit

Luxe Fitness Tracker

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Stainless steel case, elastomer band

Confidence

45%

PossibleElastomer band degradation and skin irritation

PossibleBacterial or fungal growth under band

PossibleWaterproof seal failure and internal corrosion

X-Doria Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

X-Doria

Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Stainless steel, magnetic closure

Confidence

82%

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Elastomer band degradation and skin irritation, Bacterial or fungal growth under band and Waterproof seal failure and internal corrosion on the Fitbit and not on the X-Doria.
  • We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Fitbit.
  • The Fitbit is Stainless steel case, elastomer band where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Fitbit grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking