Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct vs Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers: which is safer?
World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers edges it on pure PFAS risk, but Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct wins overall once other hazards are counted.
Our pick
Footprint
Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleBacterial/fungal growth in cellulose matrix
PossibleMicroplastic generation or fiber shedding
World Centric
Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleProprietary coating chemical migration
PossibleMoisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix
ReportedCoating degradation under heat or fatty foods
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Bacterial/fungal growth in cellulose matrix and Microplastic generation or fiber shedding on the Footprint and not on the World Centric.
- We flag Proprietary coating chemical migration, Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix, Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods and Recycling contamination if misdisposed on the World Centric and not on the Footprint.
- The Footprint is Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable) where the World Centric is Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More food packaging: see the full ranking