Women's Cutout Wrap One-Piece Swimsuit vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Gap Women's Cutout Wrap One-Piece Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Gap Women's Cutout Wrap One-Piece Swimsuit

Gap

Women's Cutout Wrap One-Piece Swimsuit

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 35/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

nylon/spandex blend swimsuit fabric

Confidence

62%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant migration

LikelySpandex degradation and microfiber shedding

PossibleFormaldehyde resin finish

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorant migration, Spandex degradation and microfiber shedding, Formaldehyde resin finish and Adhesive residue in seams and applique on the Gap and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Gap.
  • The Gap is nylon/spandex blend swimsuit fabric where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear: see the full ranking