Vivosmart 4 vs Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch: which is safer?
Garmin Vivosmart 4 is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Garmin
Vivosmart 4
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Silicone band, plastic/polymer body
Confidence
45%
PossibleSilicone band degradation and microparticle shedding
PossibleBacterial growth in band crevices and moisture traps
X-Doria
Classic Plus Stainless Steel Magnetic Closure WatchBand for Apple Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel, magnetic closure
Confidence
82%
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Silicone band degradation and microparticle shedding and Bacterial growth in band crevices and moisture traps on the Garmin and not on the X-Doria.
- We flag Nickel leaching from stainless steel on the X-Doria and not on the Garmin.
- The Garmin is Silicone band, plastic/polymer body where the X-Doria is Stainless steel, magnetic closure, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Garmin grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof fitness trackers & cases, see the full ranking