GreenLife 12 Cup Ceramic Non-Stick Muffin Pan vs GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Muffin Pan: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
GreenPan
GreenLife 12 Cup Ceramic Non-Stick Muffin Pan
PFAS grade
Excellent 90/100
Overall grade
Excellent 82/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Ceramic non-stick coating (proprietary GreenPan Thermolon)
Confidence
72%
PossibleCeramic coating degradation and aluminum exposure
PossibleMigration of coating components into food
GreenPan
GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Muffin Pan
PFAS grade
Excellent 90/100
Overall grade
Excellent 82/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Ceramic nonstick coating (proprietary blend)
Confidence
72%
PossibleCeramic coating degradation and particle ingestion
PossibleAluminum leaching (if base is aluminum)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum exposure and Migration of coating components into food on the GreenPan and not on the GreenPan.
- We flag Ceramic coating degradation and particle ingestion and Aluminum leaching (if base is aluminum) on the GreenPan and not on the GreenPan.
- The GreenPan is Ceramic non-stick coating (proprietary GreenPan Thermolon) where the GreenPan is Ceramic nonstick coating (proprietary blend), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More muffin tins: see the full ranking