GP5 Champagne Ceramic Non-stick Cookware Set vs Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan: which is safer?

Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

GREENPan GP5 Champagne Ceramic Non-stick Cookware Set

GreenPan

GP5 Champagne Ceramic Non-stick Cookware Set

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 62/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Ceramic non-stick coating

Confidence

78%

PossibleCeramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

PossibleThermal shock and coating adhesion

Our pick

GreenPan

Lima Hard Anodized Ceramic Nonstick 10 Inch Frying Pan

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

78%

PossibleAluminum leaching

PossibleCeramic coating degradation and flaking

PossibleHeat stability of coating under normal use

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching and Thermal shock and coating adhesion on the GreenPan and not on the GreenPan.
  • We flag Aluminum leaching, Ceramic coating degradation and flaking and Heat stability of coating under normal use on the GreenPan and not on the GreenPan.
  • The GreenPan is Ceramic non-stick coating where the GreenPan is Ceramic nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ceramic cookware, see the full ranking