CZone Mountain 3 Finger vs R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts: which is safer?
Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts is the clear pick. Hestra CZone Mountain 3 Finger carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Hestra
CZone Mountain 3 Finger
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating (fluorine-based water repellent)
PossibleCoating degradation and microfiber shedding
Our pick
Patagonia
R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating degradation and water-repellency loss
PossibleAllergen potential from Yulex itself
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in DWR coating (fluorine-based water repellent) and Coating degradation and microfiber shedding on the Hestra and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Coating degradation and water-repellency loss and Allergen potential from Yulex itself on the Patagonia and not on the Hestra.
- The Hestra is Leather palm, synthetic/nylon back with DWR water-repellent treatment where the Patagonia is Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Hestra grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof winter gloves: see the full ranking