Coverage Square Neck One-Piece vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Hunza G Coverage Square Neck One-Piece carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Hunza G Coverage Square Neck One-Piece

Hunza G

Coverage Square Neck One-Piece

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Nylon blend with water-repellent coating finish (likely fluorinated)

Confidence

58%

ReportedFluorinated water-repellent coating (PFAS precursor)

PossibleAzo dyes in pigmentation

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from nylon

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fluorinated DWR coating (PFAS precursor), Azo dyes in pigmentation, Microplastic shedding from nylon and Contact dermatitis from residual chemical finishes on the Hunza G and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Hunza G.
  • The Hunza G is Nylon blend with DWR finish (likely fluorinated) where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear: see the full ranking