Coverage Square Neck Swimsuit vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Hunza G Coverage Square Neck Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Hunza G
Coverage Square Neck Swimsuit
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 51/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Nylon/polyamide blend (likely nylon with elastane)
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants)
ReportedElastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber shedding
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top
PFAS grade
Excellent 90/100
Overall grade
Excellent 86/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
Confidence
72%
PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes (synthetic colorants) and Elastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber shedding on the Hunza G and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Hunza G.
- The Hunza G is Nylon/polyamide blend (likely nylon with elastane) where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More swimwear: see the full ranking