GULLVALLA sofa Silkeryd vs Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam: which is safer?

IKEA GULLVALLA sofa Silkeryd is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

IKEA GULLVALLA sofa Silkeryd

IKEA

GULLVALLA sofa Silkeryd

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

fabric upholstery, polyester blend

Confidence

62%

PossibleFormaldehyde in fabric sizing or adhesives

PossibleMicroplastics shedding

PossibleVOC off-gassing from cushion foam and glues

Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam

Joybird

Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 39/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

polyurethane foam

Confidence

72%

LikelyVolatile Organic Compound (VOC) Off-Gassing

PossibleFlame Retardant Chemical Content

PossibleFormaldehyde in Adhesives and Binders

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde in fabric sizing or adhesives, Microplastics shedding and VOC off-gassing from cushion foam and glues on the IKEA and not on the Joybird.
  • We flag Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Off-Gassing, Flame Retardant Chemical Content, Formaldehyde in Adhesives and Binders and Foam Degradation Over Time on the Joybird and not on the IKEA.
  • The IKEA is fabric upholstery, polyester blend where the Joybird is polyurethane foam, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More upholstered furniture, see the full ranking