SALTSJÖBADEN 3-seat sofa vs Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam: which is safer?

IKEA SALTSJÖBADEN 3-seat sofa is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

IKEA SALTSJÖBADEN 3-seat sofa

IKEA

SALTSJÖBADEN 3-seat sofa

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

polyester fabric upholstery, wooden frame, foam cushioning

Confidence

68%

PossibleVOC off-gassing from foam cushioning

PossiblePolyester fabric degradation under heat or UV

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from polyester upholstery wear

Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam

Joybird

Banks Sleeper Sofa Foam

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 39/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

polyurethane foam

Confidence

72%

LikelyVolatile Organic Compound (VOC) Off-Gassing

PossibleFlame Retardant Chemical Content

PossibleFormaldehyde in Adhesives and Binders

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag VOC off-gassing from foam cushioning, Polyester fabric degradation under heat or UV and Microplastic shedding from polyester upholstery wear on the IKEA and not on the Joybird.
  • We flag Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Off-Gassing, Flame Retardant Chemical Content, Formaldehyde in Adhesives and Binders and Foam Degradation Over Time on the Joybird and not on the IKEA.
  • The IKEA is polyester fabric upholstery, wooden frame, foam cushioning where the Joybird is polyurethane foam, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More upholstered furniture, see the full ranking