Men Jack Wolfskin Tempest 2L Jacket vs Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Jack Wolfskin
Men Jack Wolfskin Tempest 2L Jacket
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 2/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Polyamide with water-repellent coating
Confidence
42%
Likelywater-repellent coating composition (undisclosed, includes possible PFAS)
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket
PFAS grade
Poor 45/100
Overall grade
Bad 17/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating composition (undisclosed, includes possible PFAS) on the Jack Wolfskin and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, Antimony in polyester fiber, DWR coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals and Unverified DWR chemistry on the Patagonia and not on the Jack Wolfskin.
- The Jack Wolfskin is Polyamide with DWR coating where the Patagonia is polyester shell with DWR finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Jack Wolfskin grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cycling rain jackets: see the full ranking