Kimberly Clark U By Kotex Click Compact Tampons, Regular Absorbency, Plastic Applicator, Unscented, Compact, 53445 vs 100% Organic Cotton Tampons: which is safer?
Natracare 100% Organic Cotton Tampons is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Kimberly-Clark Kotex
Kimberly Clark U By Kotex Click Compact Tampons, Regular Absorbency, Plastic Applicator, Unscented, Compact, 53445
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Rayon core, plastic applicator, cotton/viscose exterior
Confidence
72%
PossibleToxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) from prolonged use
PossiblePlastic applicator leaching (unspecified polymer)
Our pick
Natracare
100% Organic Cotton Tampons
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
100% organic cotton
Confidence
88%
PossibleHeavy metals in pigments or cotton processing
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) from prolonged use and Plastic applicator leaching (unspecified polymer) on the Kimberly-Clark Kotex and not on the Natracare.
- We flag Heavy metals in pigments or cotton processing on the Natracare and not on the Kimberly-Clark Kotex.
- The Kimberly-Clark Kotex is Rayon core, plastic applicator, cotton/viscose exterior where the Natracare is 100% organic cotton, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Natracare is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More tampons: see the full ranking