Premium Security Tampons, Regular vs Organic Tampons: which is safer?
Lola Organic Tampons is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
U by Kotex
Premium Security Tampons, Regular
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 56/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
rayon/cotton core, plastic applicator
Confidence
72%
ReportedToxic shock syndrome (TSS) from any tampon
PossibleFragrance allergens (if scented variant)
Our pick
Lola
Organic Tampons
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 92/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
organic cotton, cardboard applicator
Confidence
82%
PossibleCardboard degradation or splinters
PossibleAllergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) from any tampon and Fragrance allergens (if scented variant) on the U by Kotex and not on the Lola.
- We flag Cardboard degradation or splinters and Allergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives on the Lola and not on the U by Kotex.
- The U by Kotex is rayon/cotton core, plastic applicator where the Lola is organic cotton, cardboard applicator, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Lola is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More tampons: see the full ranking