PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall56/ 100Good
U by Kotex Premium Security Tampons, Regular

U by Kotex · Tampons

U by Kotex Premium Security Tampons, Regular

Good

Lower concern. Minimal PFAS risk; no waterproofing claims present.

Verdict: BuyRayon-cotton core with plastic applicator poses minimal established hazards; lower PFAS risk and no major brand safety controversies on record.

Tampons are primarily rayon and cotton fibers without documented waterproofing treatments or Teflon-family coating coatings. Kotex makes no PFAS claims and standard menstrual products lack typical PFAS triggers.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

rayon/cotton core, plastic applicator

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) from any tampon

TSS is rare but documented across all tampon types and brands when worn beyond recommended intervals or in susceptible individuals. This is a usage and host-factor risk, not a material defect specific to Kotex.

45/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (if scented variant)

The Regular variant does not list fragrance; however, scented Kotex variants exist. Fragrance can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic reactions in sensitive users, though incidence is low with modern cosmetic-grade fragrances.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100

Dioxins (bleach byproduct in rayon)

Rayon is bleached during production; historical concern was dioxin residue. Modern rayon manufacturing and finished tampons are monitored and show no detectable or unsafe dioxin levels in available published data.

95/ 100

Plastic applicator leaching

Polypropylene and polyethylene applicators do not leach known endocrine disruptors or toxins at body temperature during typical use. No peer-reviewed data identifies leaching from standard plastic applicators in this product category.

95/ 100
🐛

Pesticide residue

Conventional cotton may contain pesticide residues; however, finished tampons undergo multiple processing steps that remove or degrade most pesticides. No specific testing data is published for this brand, and regulatory monitoring shows residues in tampons are below safety thresholds.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

U by Kotex Premium Security uses a rayon and cotton absorbent core, which are cellulose-based materials with long safety history in period care. The plastic applicator is typically polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene (PE), materials that do not leach when used as intended at body temperature. Rayon is bleached during manufacturing; historically this raised dioxin concerns, but modern rayon production has strict emissions controls and finished tampons show negligible dioxin residues in published testing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Kotex (owned by Kimberly-Clark) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient lists or material sourcing for tampons, which is typical for the category. The brand has faced no major recalls or safety violations related to this product line. Kimberly-Clark has not made public PFAS-free commitments for period care products, but also makes no waterproofing or water-resistant claims that would drive PFAS use.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream middle of the tampon market. It is comparable to Tampax Regular and similar rayon-cotton blends, which dominate conventional retail. Organic cotton tampons (like Seventh Generation or Cora) eliminate synthetic rayon but cost more and are not demonstrably safer; applicator material varies across brands but polypropylene is standard industry-wide.

If you buy it

Follow standard usage: replace every 4-8 hours depending on flow to reduce TSS (toxic shock syndrome) risk, which is the primary safety concern for any tampon regardless of material. Store in a cool, dry place; do not expose applicator to prolonged heat or direct sunlight. Discontinue if irritation or unusual odor develops. The plastic applicator is single-use and not recyclable; consider disposal method if environmental impact matters to you.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
U by Kotex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Tampons

Lola Organic Tampons

Lola

Organic Tampons

organic cotton, cardboard applicator

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Cardboard degradation or splinters

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Organic cotton base with third-party certifications support claim.

MADE SAFE certifiedOEKO-TEX certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Non-Toxic Applicator Free Tampons

Lola

Non-Toxic Applicator Free Tampons

organic cotton, cardboard applicator

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade100Excellent
Excellent

Lower concern. Third-party verified PFAS-free organic cotton tampons.

MADE SAFEOEKO-TEX

Lab test found no PFAS

Seventh Generation Tampons

Seventh Generation

Tampons

organic cotton, cardboard applicator

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal contamination

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; organic cotton base with PFAS-free claim.

MADE SAFE certifiedLeaping Bunny certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More tampons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.