Women's Tugless X-Back One Piece Swimsuit vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Lands' End Women's Tugless X-Back One Piece Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Lands' End
Women's Tugless X-Back One Piece Swimsuit
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified)
ReportedNylon degradation and leaching from chlorine/salt
ReportedSpandex UV and chlorine sensitivity
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified), Nylon degradation and leaching from chlorine/salt, Spandex UV and chlorine sensitivity and Microfiber shedding during laundering on the Lands' End and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Lands' End.
- The Lands' End is Nylon/spandex blend with likely DWR water-repellent finish where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Lands' End grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More swimwear, see the full ranking