Organic Tampons vs Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator: which is safer?
Lola Organic Tampons is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Lola
Organic Tampons
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 92/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
organic cotton, cardboard applicator
Confidence
82%
PossibleCardboard degradation or splinters
PossibleAllergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives
Seventh Generation
Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 58/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
organic cotton with cardboard applicator
Confidence
82%
PossiblePesticide residues (organophosphates, pyrethroids)
PossibleHeavy metals in dyes and pigments
PossibleMicrobial contamination (bacteria, mold)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Cardboard degradation or splinters and Allergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives on the Lola and not on the Seventh Generation.
- We flag Pesticide residues (organophosphates, pyrethroids), Heavy metals in dyes and pigments and Microbial contamination (bacteria, mold) on the Seventh Generation and not on the Lola.
- The Lola is organic cotton, cardboard applicator where the Seventh Generation is organic cotton with cardboard applicator, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Lola is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More tampons: see the full ranking