Organic Tampons vs Pearl Ultra Absorbancy Tampons, Unscented, 50 Count | Otc Eligible - 45 ct | CVS: which is safer?
Lola Organic Tampons is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Lola
Organic Tampons
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 92/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
organic cotton, cardboard applicator
Confidence
82%
PossibleCardboard degradation or splinters
PossibleAllergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives
Tampax
Pearl Ultra Absorbancy Tampons, Unscented, 50 Count | Otc Eligible - 45 ct | CVS
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 52/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Rayon/viscose core, polyethylene outer layer
Confidence
72%
PossibleDioxins and bleaching byproducts
ReportedToxic shock syndrome (TSS) risk
PossibleRayon irritation or allergic contact dermatitis
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Cardboard degradation or splinters and Allergic contact dermatitis from cotton or additives on the Lola and not on the Tampax.
- We flag Dioxins and bleaching byproducts, Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) risk and Rayon irritation or allergic contact dermatitis on the Tampax and not on the Lola.
- The Lola is organic cotton, cardboard applicator where the Tampax is Rayon/viscose core, polyethylene outer layer, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Lola is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More tampons: see the full ranking