Lipglass Air Non-Sticky Lip Gloss vs ShineOn Lip Jelly: which is safer?
ShineOn Lip Jelly is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
MAC
Lipglass Air Non-Sticky Lip Gloss
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Silicone-based non-sticky gloss formula (typical MAC formulation)
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens (undisclosed composition)
Possible1,4-dioxane (cosmetic solvent contaminant)
ReportedBacterial colonization on applicator wand
Our pick
Tower 28
ShineOn Lip Jelly
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Jelly base, pigments, oils
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and irritants
Possible1,4-dioxane in cosmetic ingredients
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens (undisclosed composition), 1,4-dioxane (cosmetic solvent contaminant) and Bacterial colonization on applicator wand on the MAC and not on the Tower 28.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and irritants and 1,4-dioxane in cosmetic ingredients on the Tower 28 and not on the MAC.
- The MAC is Silicone-based non-sticky gloss formula (typical MAC formulation) where the Tower 28 is Jelly base, pigments, oils, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip gloss, see the full ranking