Tour S Golf Balls vs Men's Profile Complete Golf Set: which is safer?

Maxfli Tour S Golf Balls is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Maxfli Tour S Golf Balls

Maxfli

Tour S Golf Balls

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Synthetic rubber core with surlyn or urethane cover

Confidence

72%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from cover wear

PossibleResidual mold or bacterial growth in storage

Wilson Men's Profile Complete Golf Set

Wilson

Men's Profile Complete Golf Set

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips

Confidence

78%

PossibleGraphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure

PossibleRubber grip deterioration and skin contact

PossibleNickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microplastic shedding from cover wear and Residual mold or bacterial growth in storage on the Maxfli and not on the Wilson.
  • We flag Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure, Rubber grip deterioration and skin contact and Nickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads on the Wilson and not on the Maxfli.
  • The Maxfli is Synthetic rubber core with surlyn or urethane cover where the Wilson is Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More golf balls & equipment, see the full ranking