Women's Mila One-Piece Swimsuit vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. MIKOH Women's Mila One-Piece Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

MIKOH Women's Mila One-Piece Swimsuit

Mikoh

Women's Mila One-Piece Swimsuit

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Nylon/polyamide blend swimwear fabric

Confidence

62%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant toxicity

PossibleFormaldehyde-based finishing resins

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and colorant toxicity, Formaldehyde-based finishing resins, Microplastic shedding during use and Allergic reaction to dyes or elastane blend on the Mikoh and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Mikoh.
  • The Mikoh is Nylon/polyamide blend swimwear fabric where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear: see the full ranking