Eco-Wax Quick Wax Cool vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
mountainFLOW
Eco-Wax Quick Wax Cool
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleParticulate inhalation during hot application
PossibleThermal degradation volatiles
PossiblePFAS in fluorinated glide additives (unconfirmed)
Our pick
Star Ski Wax
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor
PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis
PossibleIngestion risk in children
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Particulate inhalation during hot application, Thermal degradation volatiles and PFAS in fluorinated glide additives (unconfirmed) on the mountainFLOW and not on the Star Ski Wax.
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the mountainFLOW.
- The mountainFLOW is wax-based ski/snowboard wax where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- We are less certain about the mountainFLOW grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking