Hydro Boost SPF 50 Moisturizer vs Skin Food Body Butter: which is safer?
Skin Food Body Butter is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Neutrogena
Hydro Boost SPF 50 Moisturizer
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 63/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Water-based moisturizer with humectants (hyaluronic acid); no coating or treatment
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens
Possible1,4-dioxane (manufacturing residue)
PossiblePreservative sensitivity (formaldehyde-releasers)
Our pick
Weleda
Skin Food Body Butter
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 92/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Plant oils, butters, waxes
Confidence
82%
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleOil oxidation and rancidity
Where these two actually differ
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (manufacturing residue) and Preservative sensitivity (formaldehyde-releasers) on the Neutrogena and not on the Weleda.
- We flag Oil oxidation and rancidity on the Weleda and not on the Neutrogena.
- Both carry a flag for Fragrance allergens, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Neutrogena is Water-based moisturizer with humectants (hyaluronic acid); no coating or treatment where the Weleda is Plant oils, butters, waxes, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Weleda is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More moisturizer, see the full ranking