9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro vs Men's Profile Complete Golf Set: which is safer?
Wilson Men's Profile Complete Golf Set is the clear pick. 9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Nike
9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyFluorinated water-resistant coating (PFAS implied)
PossiblePolymer coating degradation and microplastic shedding
PossibleDyes and pigments in metallic finishes
Our pick
Wilson
Men's Profile Complete Golf Set
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleGraphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
PossibleRubber grip deterioration and skin contact
PossibleNickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fluorinated water-resistant coating (PFAS implied), Polymer coating degradation and microplastic shedding and Dyes and pigments in metallic finishes on the Nike and not on the Wilson.
- We flag Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure, Rubber grip deterioration and skin contact and Nickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads on the Wilson and not on the Nike.
- The Nike is Synthetic polymer cover, waterproof coating unspecified where the Wilson is Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Wilson is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Nike grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More golf balls & equipment, see the full ranking