PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro

Nike Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

9-pack Golf Balls; Chromax Metallic, Nike Juice Plus 312, & Nitro

Poor

Golf balls likely treated with water-resistant coatings; brand discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: SkipGolf balls pose minimal acute chemical hazard; PFAS water-coating concern is real but typical for the category and does not warrant avoidance.

Golf ball covers typically use synthetic polymers with unspecified waterproofing treatments. Nike provides no material or PFAS disclosure for this product mix.

The safe swap

Nike Golf Ball

Nike Golf

Nike Golf Ball

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic polymer cover, waterproof coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf balls universally use fluorinated polymers for durability and water repellency. Nike does not disclose the specific compound. Low exposure risk during use, but PFAS in the coating is standard industry practice and a known environmental concern.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Polymer coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Surlyn and urethane coatings degrade over time with UV exposure and impact wear. Fine polymer particles may shed during play. Risk is minimal for recreational golfers but higher for driving range staff handling balls daily.

70/ 100
🎨

Dyes and pigments in metallic finishes

Chromax Metallic finish uses pigments for color. Industrial golf ball pigments are typically azo-based or heavy-metal-free alternatives, but formulations are proprietary. Risk from skin or oral contact is low in normal play.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test results for heavy metal contamination in Nike Juice Plus or Nitro balls are on record. Rubber compounds typically use antimony oxide as a vulcanization aid, but migration during normal play is negligible.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Off-gassing or volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

No documented off-gassing concerns for golf balls. Polymer covers and cores are not known to release significant VOCs under normal storage or use conditions.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These Nike golf balls use synthetic polymer covers (likely surlyn or urethane) with an unspecified waterproof coating to resist moisture penetration and maintain flight consistency. The core is typically a rubber-based compound. The waterproof coating is the chemical uncertainty here: it is very likely fluorinated (PFAS-based) because that is the industry standard for water resistance in golf balls, but Nike discloses nothing about the formulation. Surlyn and urethane themselves are stable polymers with low migration risk during normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has a mixed environmental transparency record but has not published commitments on PFAS elimination in sports equipment. The company does not disclose coating chemistry for golf balls. Nike has faced scrutiny on apparel PFAS use but has not addressed golf ball formulations in public statements. No recalls or safety incidents linked to these specific ball models are on record.

How it compares in its category

All mainstream golf balls (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Bridgestone) rely on fluorinated water-resistant coatings; Nike is not an outlier here. Golf balls are a niche consumer product with far lower skin contact and ingestion risk than apparel or food-contact items. The polymer matrix itself is more chemically stable than soft plastics, so leaching of additives during normal play is minimal.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent coating degradation and polymer brittleness over time. Rinse balls after saltwater play to extend coating life. There is no need for special handling; normal golf use (impact, brief skin contact) does not present acute chemical exposure. Replace when surface cracks, cuts, or scuffing become severe, as coating integrity decline may affect flight and is a signal the ball is nearing end of life. Avoid intentional burning or heating of balls.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike Golf has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Nike Golf

Nike Power Distance Long Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer golf ball core and cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Golf balls pose minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Rubber, synthetic polymer core; urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Microplastic shedding during use

Limited concern

70

Golf balls present minimal PFAS exposure risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nike PD Soft

Nike Golf

Nike PD Soft

Surlyn ionomer cover, soft polymer core

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent
🫧

Microplastic shedding during use or wear

Limited concern

70

Golf ball with standard polymers, lower concern than coated apparel.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.