Golf Ball vs Men's Profile Complete Golf Set: which is safer?
Nike Golf Ball is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Nike
Golf Ball
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Synthetic rubber/elastomer core, urethane/polyurethane cover
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use or degradation
Wilson
Men's Profile Complete Golf Set
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
Confidence
78%
PossibleGraphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
PossibleRubber grip deterioration and skin contact
PossibleNickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding during use or degradation on the Nike and not on the Wilson.
- We flag Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure, Rubber grip deterioration and skin contact and Nickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads on the Wilson and not on the Nike.
- The Nike is Synthetic rubber/elastomer core, urethane/polyurethane cover where the Wilson is Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More golf balls & equipment, see the full ranking