Waterproofing Wax for Leather vs Fabric and Upholstery Protector: which is safer?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 51/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

wax-based waterproofing

Confidence

78%

PossibleRespiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

ReportedPFAS in water repellency treatment

Scotchgard Fabric and Upholstery Protector

Scotchgard

Fabric and Upholstery Protector

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Proprietary fabric/upholstery treatment coating

Confidence

35%

LikelyPFAS (fluorochemicals) - composition undisclosed

PossibleInhalation exposure during application

PossibleSkin sensitization or irritation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application and PFAS in water repellency treatment on the Nikwax and not on the Scotchgard.
  • We flag PFAS (fluorochemicals) - composition undisclosed, Inhalation exposure during application, Skin sensitization or irritation and Environmental persistence and bioaccumulation on the Scotchgard and not on the Nikwax.
  • The Nikwax is wax-based waterproofing where the Scotchgard is Proprietary fabric/upholstery treatment coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Nikwax is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Scotchgard grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fabric stain guard sprays, see the full ranking